I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it

For doing something great for the world, this world’s waiting for people like us!3. I found that one of the answer is poverty and I used to think it’s a crime and I blamed on it.So I look back on a developing country I know, where many people interpret education value in an economical term.

)Many houses were bugglared  by local thiefs (including mine), many prostitutes stand in each dark corners, many children don’t understand the meaning of school, many people have been working with less than minimum wage pay out.Many people say the world is about injustice but how many people in the world have stood out to act against this iniquity world? The St. Louis couple is facing felony charges for pointing a firearm in an unsafe direction, with their finger on the trigger.We unfortunately cannot legislate emotions.

How do we get guns out of the bad peoples hands instead on only getting guns out of the good peoples hands? But they are fighting for the right of people to own and brandish guns that don't give a shit about gun safety.Instead you have one side trying to come up with more ways to restrict guns and the other side who is blindly opposed to any gun laws.Restricting the flow of guns and maintaining those restrictions seems that it would require more policing too.. That would seem incompatible with a lot anti-2a people as well.As in those four silly little gun safety "laws".

That comes with the responsibility to use it in a safe manner.

For listening to every heart broken songs that had been written for us and it will sound best at this time.14. Being pro 2A doesn't mean you support safe gun ownership. Does “Marley & Me” promote negligent dog ownership?12.

A little political will could change that situation.Yes, I would tend to agree that any time there's a law against purchase/possession of a commodity, and more than say 10% of the population would consider owning it in violation of the law, you have a law that's basically unenforceable.This is the problem with the gun debate even here. So I adopted the famous saying by Evelyn Beatrice Hall: "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it", which more or less sums up the philosophy of defenders of the First Amendment. I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it. Which they aren't. They are the opposite of "laws". No matter how you feel about gun ownership, I doubt you'd consent to have a few armed police officers come search your house to ensure that you don't have any. For knowing that loosing a lot of tears doesn’t really make ourselves dehydrated.22. This is one of the most divisive issues in the US. They just dont want any more laws since many are already useless, unenforceable, or just plain stupid.I would happily take on that requirementMost gun owners that I know believe that better enforcement of our existing gun laws and improving the existing background check system would keep a lot of guns out of the hands of the people who should not have them.They can condemn it all the way to Washington and back. Just that!

For life lesson that we could share with others in the future.I’m sitting in the land where poverty plays such a big role. At least in this case, they're focusing on a fundamental right and the history of the government not respecting that right.I love that one. But this seems sacrilegious in the US, with it's over the top gun fetish.Confused sweaty guy trying to press one button3. There is no room for someone like me to bring any nuance to the debate.If I had my way, those two wouldn't be able to own guns unless they've had some kind of actual training and legal education on what they can and cannot do with guns.So based on what I'm reading from your post-- you advocate restrictions not for gun ownership, but rather punishment for unsafe gun handling? Guns, by contrast, require significant capital to produce at scale, and the US is one of the places where capital and economies of scale are most abundant. For telling the story of today as a joke of tomorrow.Marley’s owners, played by Owen Wilson and Jennifer Aniston, “sit by with a kind of bemused helplessness” as their wayward Labrador commits bad deed after bad deed, Collins says. We should strive to find a way to rebuild our gun laws to achieve that.The most stringent gun control measures (like outlawing handguns) would require a door-to-door search to find and confiscate the illegal guns. Even going as far as openly declare themselves to be single issue voters on this issue in this very sub. Along that same line, should there be any gun restrictions say, far in the future, depending on the type of firearm that becomes readily accessible to the public?

Similar to many existing regulations on gun ownership... Alas, any law concerning gun ownership is rejected on principle by supporters of 2A.I suppose that would make those gun safety laws more realistic.As in those four silly little gun safety "laws".

.